The absence of the thing judged in concentrated control of constitutionality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24862/rcdu.v13i1.1517Abstract
The present work aims to analyze the doctrinal divergence about the absence of res judicata in the concentrated control of constitutionality. Certainly, this is an issue that assumes relevance insofar as it is possible to observe a degree of instability in the decisions of the Supreme Court. In this sense, discussing the occurrence (or not) of the institutes that cover the stabilization of the STF jurisprudence is a necessary task. The hypothesis considered is that the confrontation of the aforementioned issue involves the inevitable distinction between text and norm, as the debate on the link to the STF decisions and the necessary updating of its jurisprudence requires special care. The method adopted for the hypothetical-deductive method, inferring, in the end, that the best way to conceive a legal security for concentrated control is from the combination of res judicata with the other institutes that are inherent to it.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The UNIFOR Law Course Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author grants to the journal their copyright and first publication rights, with work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 - International license that allows the sharing of work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Through the Creative Commons CC BY License adopted by the magazine, the author transfers the copyright and publication rights of the article to the magazine. This license allows others to distribute, remix, adapt, create from your work, even for commercial purposes, provided they give you due credit for the original creation.
More information about the adopted license can be obtained by clicking on the Creative Commons link above.











