ADMINISTRATIVE-LEGAL AND CRIMINAL ASPECTS OF THE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE: FOREIGN EXPERIENCE AND DIRECTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT

foreign experience and directions for improvement

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24862/rcdu.v16i2.2111

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to clarify foreign experience concerning legal regulation of the prosecutor’s office functioning. Based on a comparative study of foreign prosecutors’ offices, data on their place in the government system, type of model and main functions are given, and this gives an idea of the role and directions of development of the prosecutor's office in the leading countries of the modern world. In Germany, public prosecutor's offices function at all levels of general courts. The Federal Prosecutor General exercises his powers under the overall direction of the German Minister of Justice. It is noted that the modern French prosecutor's office belongs to the executive branch of government and is subordinate to the Ministry of Justice. Officials of the prosecutor’s office are very close to the judicial corps, as they receive the same training and in the course of their careers often move from prosecutors to judges and vice versa. According to the special law defining the legal position of the prosecutor’s office in Latvia, the prosecutor’s office is a judicial authority that independently supervises the observance of legality within the limits of the established competence. In Great Britain, there is no public prosecutor’s office or its direct counterpart at all. In the system of state authorities, the Royal Prosecutor’s Office functions as a self-consistent and independent authority, whose activities are coordinated by the Attorney General. In the Republic of Lithuania, prosecutors organize and manage the process of pre-trial investigation, and they also support the state prosecution in criminal cases. It has been concluded that there is no single standard in Europe regarding the model of the prosecutor’s office. The analyzed models of prosecutor’s offices have advantages and disadvantages, but none of them is excluded and neither of the models is preferred.

Key words: prosecutor’s office, organization of the prosecutor’s office, model of the prosecutor’s office of foreign countries, location of the prosecutor’s office, powers of the prosecutor of foreign countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Yevhen Leheza, University of Customs and Finance

Professor, Doctor of Science in law. Professor at the Department of Public And Private Law.

Tetiana Slutska, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Candidate of Law,  Institute of Lawmaking and Scientific and Legal Expertise

Tetiana Voloshanivska, Odessa State University of Internal Affairs

Doctor of Science, Associate Professor. Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law Disciplines at the Institute of Law and Security.

 

Downloads

Published

2025-05-12

How to Cite

Leheza, Y., Slutska, T., & Voloshanivska, T. (2025). ADMINISTRATIVE-LEGAL AND CRIMINAL ASPECTS OF THE PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE: FOREIGN EXPERIENCE AND DIRECTIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT: foreign experience and directions for improvement. The UNIFOR Law Course Journal, 16(1), e252025. https://doi.org/10.24862/rcdu.v16i2.2111

Issue

Section

Artigos